Torque / Power Graph

**nutron** · 1st April 2006, 22:37

Here the scan of my Rolling Road run last week

**nutron** · 1st April 2006, 22:45

These are road wheel figures though, the first graph shows the Remap and the box+Remap on the same graph (estimated flywheel figures)

**nutron** · 3rd April 2006, 16:49

Here is a graph with figures from before the Re-Map to compare
(Top three lines are lbft obviously and the lower three are bhp at fly)

**ion** · 3rd April 2006, 16:57

Thats certainly impressive mate, what's it drive like?

**nutron** · 5th April 2006, 09:36

Without the box it's smooth but rappid and gets about 44mpg in town and upto 60+ on the motorway.

With the box in it will give you wiplash every time you accelerate and it goes like STIG. I haven't really driven sensibly with the box in though so my mpg have been pretty poor. On top of that the clutch slips with the box quite a bit; not sure if the clutch has had it or if there is too much torque but it think it may be the former.

**AJA** · 5th April 2006, 09:45

The more I look at the 888 graph the more I like the look of it.

**nutron** · 5th April 2006, 14:33

The 888 map is the middle one, with the standard map+box below and the re-map+box at the top of the tree.

If you want good fuel economy then the 888 re-map as it is would probably give an increase in said as well as extra power.

but when you can get an average of 47mpg at 205bhp (which I can) why settle for a half job; so long as the clutch isn't going to be a big issue that is.