This shouldnt be allowed
http://uk.news.launch.yahoo.com/dyna...ml&e=l_news_dm
This shouldnt be allowed
http://uk.news.launch.yahoo.com/dyna...ml&e=l_news_dm
that is bad very bad
they should pay the money to a charity that protects children that have been abused not to that sick *******
Crazy... but I'm not too surprised, we live in such a decadent world these days nothing surprises me any more.
I'd pay him 100,000 pounds.
Of concrete.
Phil
Crazy.....
Well lets face it there aren't that many songs in the world that have the word touch in them are there
Money over principal again.
If they need to use that song (and I'm not going into that separate debate) then they need to pay the royalties.
IMO, It makes NO difference that he is a convicted paedophile - the song was made amny years ago and if he's entitled to it then it is rightfully his.
If his crime was murder and rape of a middle aged woman would there be this outcry, for murder alone, for assault, for threatening behaviour??? - Where do you draw the proverbial line??
Clearly he has something ghastly wrong with him, and I cannot give him anything but contempt.
I've given this some thought, why don't they use Sam Fox's Touch Me song instead, looks like HP have either a nonce somewhere up top or just cannot see that ppl like me will now boycott them if they think they are going to give my money to something that is clearly a danger to everyday families.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks