Car was serviced today and the report said:
Front pads/disks 80%
Rear pads/disks 30% (replacement required)
I'm a bit surprised as I expected the rears to outlast the fronts not the other way around. The mechanic said that nothing was binding.
I'm still on the original pads&disks all round (29k miles) so is this usual for the rears to wear out so much quicker than the fronts?
And is it usual to need new disks on the first pad change?
Not a big job so I'll get the bits at the weekend. Didn't expect the disks though!