User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Vectra 1.9 CDTi '04 vs '05 and after...

  1. #1
    Regular Member th3sundanc3kid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Budleigh Salterton
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Vehicle InfoStats





    Default Vectra 1.9 CDTi '04 vs '05 and after...

    I'm picking up a 2004 Vectra 1.9 CDTi SRi 150 on Tuesday.

    Whilst looking I noticed the '04 versions are listed as doing 0-60 in 8.8 seconds, whereas anything '05 and after supposedly does 0-60 in 9.8 seconds, why the second difference?

    I'm certainly no expert, but spec-wise they look almost the same, both 1.9, 150bhp, and the latter versions have more torque.

    Can anyone explain why the '04 versions should be 1 second faster to 60mph?

  2. #2
    Regular Member kenp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Kr. Hyllinge, Denmark
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Vehicle InfoStats

    Vehicle : Insignia

    Trim : Dynamic

    Engine : 1.6 turbo

    Year : 2019

    Mileage : 44000

    Default

    one change is that 04 didnt have DPF, where its possible on the 05 onwards.

  3. #3
    Regular Member th3sundanc3kid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Budleigh Salterton
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Vehicle InfoStats





    Default

    Would that explain the 0-60 difference?

  4. #4
    Regular Member john_k_sri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Waterloo, Liverpool
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Vehicle InfoStats

    Vehicle : Insignia Grand Sport

    Trim : SRI VX-LINE NAV

    Engine : 1.5T (165)

    Year : 2018

    Mileage : 37000

    Default

    07 CDTI 150 does 0-60 in 8.9 secs, according to VX figures.

    You don't get a diesel for its 0-60 time, try 30-70 instead. LOL

  5. #5
    Regular Member th3sundanc3kid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Budleigh Salterton
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Vehicle InfoStats





    Default

    Where are you getting those figures from? I was just going by what I've seen on AutoTrader and Parkers website (s), and they only list 0-60 times.

    I'm just curious really, I don't see any obvious difference that would make a 1 second difference. Just trying to learn a thing or two

  6. #6
    Regular Member john_k_sri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Waterloo, Liverpool
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Vehicle InfoStats

    Vehicle : Insignia Grand Sport

    Trim : SRI VX-LINE NAV

    Engine : 1.5T (165)

    Year : 2018

    Mileage : 37000

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by th3sundanc3kid View Post
    Where are you getting those figures from? I was just going by what I've seen on AutoTrader and Parkers website (s), and they only list 0-60 times.

    I'm just curious really, I don't see any obvious difference that would make a 1 second difference. Just trying to learn a thing or two
    Using manufacturer's own figures. Admittedly not known to be 100% accurate.

  7. #7
    On a Sabbatical
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Antrim
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Vehicle InfoStats





    Default

    If you search the net there are several different 0-60 times listed. I think the figure given in Parkers is just plain wrong! 9.8 seconds is too slow for a 150bhp car of this size.

  8. #8
    Regular Member john_k_sri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Waterloo, Liverpool
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    26 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Vehicle InfoStats

    Vehicle : Insignia Grand Sport

    Trim : SRI VX-LINE NAV

    Engine : 1.5T (165)

    Year : 2018

    Mileage : 37000

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by WilliamLX View Post
    If you search the net there are several different 0-60 times listed. I think the figure given in Parkers is just plain wrong! 9.8 seconds is too slow for a 150bhp car of this size.
    Yep. But the 9.8 figure is close to VX quoted figures for 1.9 CDTI 150 Estates Signums and Autos. Maybe someone got their wires crossed.

  9. #9
    Full Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    N/A
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Vehicle InfoStats

    Vehicle : Golf 7

    Trim : GTD

    Engine : 2.0 TDI 184PS

    Year : 2014

    Mileage : 40000

    Default

    The 1.9 150 is 8.8s and 8.9s for both pre facelift and facelift hatchbacks respectively.

    Gazza4

  10. #10
    Regular Member kamar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    bradford
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Vehicle InfoStats





    Default

    ive done 7 seconds flat with 1 passenger and half tank of diesel so im not worried in any way.lol

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 1.9 Vectra CDTi 150 VS 2.0 CDTi 160 insignia Sri
    By Derek Mc in forum Vectra C / Signum Car Chat
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 12th May 2011, 11:38
  2. Vectra 1.9 CDTI Sri Versus 3.0 CDTI V6 Sri
    By collateral in forum Vectra C / Signum Car Chat
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 21st April 2009, 20:18
  3. FS - Vectra SRI CDTI 150
    By rscosworth in forum Cars for sale
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 16th July 2006, 22:11

Visitors found this page by searching for:

Nobody landed on this page from a search engine, yet!

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •